The Economic Benefits of Parks in Urban Spaces - Global Evidence and Implications for Belgrade, Serbia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62907/eemr250402048mKeywords:
Urban parks, economic benefits, Belgrade, SerbiaAbstract
Urban parks are increasingly recognized as economic infrastructure that affect health, property markets, tourism and climate resilience, but transition‑economy cities rarely assess these benefits systematically. This paper synthesizes international evidence on the economic benefits of urban parks and develops a research and policy framework for Belgrade, Serbia. Using a Total Economic Value and ecosystem‑services lens, the paper distinguishes four benefit domains: (i) health and avoided healthcare costs; (ii) property values and municipal finance; (iii) tourism and local economic development; and (iv) ecosystem services and avoided infrastructure costs. Systematic reviews, hedonic pricing studies and cost-benefit analyses show consistent evidence that proximity to parks raises housing values, increases physical activity and reduces obesity, supports tourism and small and medium enterprises, and provides cooling, flood mitigation and air‑quality improvements whose annual value often exceeds park operating budgets.
The paper then applies this framework to Belgrade. Drawing on recent Serbian studies of urban green space and health, indicative real‑estate statistics and observed visitor flows to flagship parks such as Kalemegdan and Ada Ciganlija, it outlines how hedonic pricing, health‑impact valuation, tourism impact assessment and ecosystem‑service benefits transfer could be combined into an integrated valuation of the city’s park system. The contribution is conceptual and strategic rather than empirical: it fills a gap in Southeast European urban economics by articulating a coherent research agenda and policy framework that treat Belgrade’s parks as productive assets and position them within economic development, health and climate strategies.
Downloads
References
1. Baró, F., Chaparro, L., Gómez Baggethun, E., Langemeyer, J., Nowak, D. J., & Terradas, J. (2014). Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: The case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain. Ambio, 43(4), 466-479.
2. Bennett, J., Gillespie, R., Powell, R., & Chalmers, L. (1996). The economic value and regional economic impact of national parks. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 3(4), 229-239.
3. Chelli, A., Brander, L., & Geneletti, D. (2025). Cost-benefit analysis of urban nature based solutions: A systematic review of approaches and scales with a focus on benefit valuation. Ecosystem Services, 71, 101684.
4. Crompton, J. L. (2001). The impact of parks on property values: A review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(1), 1-31.
5. Gubić, I., & Wolff, M. (2022). Use and design of public green spaces in Serbian cities during the COVID 19 pandemic. Habitat International, 128, 102651.
6. Ijatuyi, E. J., et al. (2025). Sustainable tourism and green space: Exploring how green spaces and natural attractions contribute to local tourism economies and revenue generation in Gauteng province. Discover Sustainability, 6, 236.
7. Kecman, S., et al. (2025). The impact of small urban green space on the urban thermal environment: The Belgrade case study (Serbia). Forests, 16(2), 321.
8. Konijnendijk, C. C., Annerstedt, M., Busse Nielsen, A., & Maruthaveeran, S. (2013). Benefits of urban parks: A systematic review. Report for the International Federation of Parks and Recreation Administration (IFPRA).
9. Lin, I. H., Wu, C., & De Sousa, C. (2013). Examining the economic impact of park facilities on neighboring residential property values. Applied Geography, 45, 322- 331.
10. Simović, I., et al. (2023). Underlying mechanisms of urban green areas’ influence on residents’ health: A case study from Belgrade, Serbia. Forests, 14(5), 765.
11. Sutton, P. C., Duncan, S. L., & Anderson, S. J. (2019). Valuing our national parks: An ecological economics perspective. Land, 8(54).
12. Tempesta, T. (2015). Benefits and costs of urban parks: A review. Aestimum, 67, 127-143.
13. Urban Institute. (2022). The health benefits of parks and their economic impacts. Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
14. Vujčić, M., Tomić, I., Grbić, M., Stojić, S., & Vuković, D. (2019). Connection between urban green areas and visitors’ physical and mental well being in Belgrade (Serbia). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40, 1-8.
15. Wilson, J., et al. (2023). The economic value of health benefits associated with urban park investment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(9), 4815.
16. Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234-244.
17. CeneNekretnina. (n.d.). Statistika cena stanova. Retrieved from https://www.cenenekretnina.rs/
18. CityExpert. (n.d.). Real estate prices in Belgrade: Average apartment price by municipality. Retrieved from https://cityexpert.rs/
19. Halo oglasi. (n.d.). Real estate listings for Belgrade. Retrieved from https://www.halooglasi.com/
20. Nekretnine.rs. (n.d.). Real estate listings for Belgrade. Retrieved from https://www.nekretnine.rs/
21. 4zida. (n.d.). Real estate listings for Belgrade. Retrieved from https://www.4zida.rs/
22. Beocity. (n.d.). Real estate listings for Belgrade. Retrieved from https://www.beocitynekretnine.rs/